The 6-step
guide to a perfect apology
How to
express regret without coming off as "sorry but not sorry"
According to recent news reports,
Canadian PM Justin Trudeau will soon issue an apology for a 102-year-old
incident where the country turned away a ship of 300 Indians who had sai led
ashore looking for a better life.
Trudeau's
intention has b e en wel l-r e c eive d by many. After all, nothing like a
heartfelt apology to right a historic wrong.
However,
the success of a mea culpa is about ex ecution. Roy Lewicki, professor emeritus
of management and human resources at the Ohio State University's Fisher Col
lege of Busi ness, published a research this month, which found that there are
six basic elements of an effective apol ogy. The more points you hit, the more
likely it is that your apology will be accepted. Here are the six features, in
order of importance:
Acknowledgement
of responsibility
This
means admitting that something was your fault and taking ownership over the
mistake. This is in di rect opposition to the notorious “mistakes wer e m ade“
non apology apology, popular a mon g politi cians and others looking to shirk
legal obligation. Think back to the FIFA corruption scandal or the Lance
Armstrong doping controversy, where the apologies came across as insincere. The
“sorry but not sorry“ approach communicates to the listener that a problem
occurred, but the `apologiser' doesn't know who did it, if there are any consequences,
or how serious it is.
Offer
of repair
This
is when people promise to correct the mistake they made by explaining what
they're going to do to fix things. A good example of this is Microsoft CEO
Satya Nadella, who initiated a companywide policy change after making some
regrettable comments about why women did not receive raises.
Expression
of regret
This
is the actual apology, when you get to say “I'm sorry.“ Lewicki found that this
was only the thirdmost important thing you should say when apologising to
someone.
Explanation
of what went wrong
It's
tough to not let this part veer off into excuses. The value of trying is that
it provides an explanation that the wronged party can understand and empathise
with.However, there are at least two different kinds of explanations.
The
first explanation is one of competence: Was the wrongdo ing an honest mistake,
something that was overlooked accidentally or something that wasn't properly
considered? Or was the wrongdoing a violation of integrity that reflects on the
apologiser's character? In other words, was it accidental or on purpose?
Declaration of repentance
Lewicki
says that this is an opportunity to promise that you won't let the mistake
happen again.
Request
for forgiveness
This
is the least important element of an apology according to Lewicki's survey
research. All six elements will depend on the situation, but Lewicki suspects
that this element in particular could depend most on context. Are the aggressor
and wronged party trying to re-build a relationship? Or is the apology about a
business transaction gone wrong, and thus isn't as emotion ally charged? These
con textual clues could deter mine whether or not a request for for giveness is
truly needed.
You
don't have to hit all six of these for the apolog y to work, says Lewicki, but
the most i mpor t a nt are the first two. Elements three to five are of equal
weight, and element six is the one you c a n sk ip a nd still achieve the
desired effect of being forgiven.
Source |
Economic Times | 19 April 2016
Regards
Pralhad Jadhav
Senior Manager @ Library
Khaitan & Co
Upcoming Event | National Conference on
Future Librarianship: Innovation for Excellence (NCFL 2016) during April 22-23,
2016.
Note | If anybody use these post for
forwarding in any social media coverage or covering in the Newsletter please
give due credit to those who are taking efforts for the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment