7 Theories
Why Web Meetings Have Not Killed the Conference Call
How
many old-fashioned telephone conference calls have you participated in this
month?
You
know these calls. You first dial in a number. Then you hit a huge
string of random numbers to be placed in the correct call. Then you
announce yourself. Then you hear a loud beep. If you are lucky, the
“conference organizer” has entered in the correct host code.
You
have no idea who is on the other end of the call - and talking over each other
and being accidentally on mute are all part of the conference call experience.
Contrast
the experience of a conference call with that of Skype, Google Hangouts, Adobe
Connect, WebEx, Xoom, Fuze, AnyMeeting, BlueJeans, GoToMeeting, Join.me, etc.
etc. (what am I missing?).
These
web conferencing systems (many of them free) allow us to see each other with
our webcams, use our computers for audio, chat, share our screens, take notes,
and much else.
Web
conferencing has progresses to a point where the platforms are stable and the
features are easy to use. Bandwidth has improved to a point where almost
all web conferences have good audio and video. Increasingly, web
conferences are initiated and held using mobile devices - so it is not
necessary to be at a computer (or on WiFi) to have a web meeting.
So
why is it then that we persist in having telephone conference calls?
Why
hasn’t web conferencing eliminated the need for telephone conferencing?
7
Theories:
Theory
1 - Change Is Hard:
Many
of us are simply more comfortable with the telephone conference call. We
have been doing our distributed group meetings and on-the-fly group meetings
with our conference call numbers, and we see no reason to change.
Theory
2 - Reliability and Simplicity:
A
telephone conference call may be low-tech, but it works. The audio on our
telephones is consistent, and usually of good quality. Holding a group
discussion with an online platform means dealing with microphones that don’t
work, webcams that don’t start, and computers that crash. We prize
simplicity and reliability over most things when it comes to our
communications.
Theory
3 - The Group In the Room:
Most
of our conference calls involve setups where a group of people are in a single
room, and everyone else is somewhere else. The group in the room sits
around the conference phone. Web meetings only really work if everyone is
on the web meeting. Setting up a single computer in a room for the web
conference almost never works. The audio doesn’t capture everyone.
The field of view for the webcam is too small. And it seems weird to make
people who gather in a single room all go on the web meeting - not to mention
audio problems with this approach.
Theory
4 - Too Many Choices:
How
many different web conferencing systems are used on your campus? There
are Skype calls, and WebEx calls, and Google Hangouts calls, Blue Jeans
meetings, and Adobe Connect Calls - and who knows what else going in your
organization. Colleges and universities may be particularly bad at
standardizing on a single platform. And people have their strong
preferences about the web meeting platform that they prefer. All this
choice in platforms may be causing people to choose none, as they don’t know
which to choose.
Theory
5 - Mobile:
All
the web conferencing platforms talk about their mobile options. From what
I have observed, however, most people will choose their desktop web
conferencing system when given a choice. Mobile web conferencing may work
fine, but if it is not used then people will not be comfortable using the apps.
Theory
6 - FaceTime:
Apple’s
FaceTime is a simple, reliable, and elegant web call solution. But only
for those in the Apple ecosystem. And only if you want to talk to one
person at a time. My guess is that many people use FaceTime instead of
web conferencing tools that are cross-platform and can support multiple
people. The lack of practice and familiarity with web conferencing
systems means that using one of these platforms for work is not top-of-mind.
Theory
7 - Multitasking:
It
may be that people like old-fashioned telephone conferences because we don’t
want to give our full attention to the call. We want to check e-mail,
surf the web, and work on that PowerPoint - while also talking on the
phone. Web conferencing systems make multitasking more challenging, as
people can see what we are doing (webcams), and the screen real estate is often
taken with presentations and chat. Web conferencing may lead to more
focused and productive meetings, as everyone knows that multitasking is a myth.
What
are your theories on the persistence of the telephone conference call?
How
do you hold your meetings when everyone in the meeting is not in the same room?
Regards
Pralhad
Jadhav
Senior
Librarian
Khaitan
& Co
Upcoming
Event | National Conference on Future Librarianship: Innovation for Excellence
(NCFL 2016) during April 22-23, 2016.
Note
| If anybody use these post for forwarding in any social media coverage or
covering in the Newsletter please give due credit to those who are taking
efforts for the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment