Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Hefty penalties for violation of fees, admission norms

The state's private unaided institutes will henceforth have to adhere to norms on regulation of admission and fees, as per an ordinance passed by Governor Ch Vidya sagar Rao on May 21. Subsequently, a circular was also issued by SK Mahajan, director of the Higher and Technical Education Department on June 5, directing minority institutions to adhere to the norms.

Institutes that don't follow admissions norms for three years in a row will face stern action. While the amount of fine for charging excess fees is not specified, the ordinance states that the first offence will draw a fine of Rs 1 lakh to Rs 5 lakh or twice the amount taken in excess. The next offence will invite a fine of between Rs 2 lakh and Rs 10 lakh or twice the amount taken in excess. The ordinance also mentions imprisonment upto six months for acts of fraud.

The ordinance explains eligibility conditions for admission in an unaided minority educational institution, which mandates 51% of seats for students from within the state from the minority community the institute represents. Seats must be allocated based on merit and CET results, and those left vacant will have to be surrendered to the authority, who will then try to fill them with other students from the minority community. If seats still remain vacant, they will be offered to the general category.

Unlike the current regulatory body, Shikshan Shulka Samiti (SSS), which does not have any judiciary members, the Fee Regulating Authority will be headed by a retired High Court judge. Other members will include a chartered accountant, a cost accountant, a former vice chancellor, registrar of Maharashtra University of health sciences, director of technical education and director of higher education among others.

The ordinance says the Admission Regulating Authority will be chaired by a retired judge, and mentions several criteria for members to ensure optimum transparency. The authority will conduct and monitor the CET, scrutinise admission proposals, cancel admissions when required, and address grievances.

While unaided private institutes were unwilling to comment, a principal on condition of anonymity said, “Unlike SSS which is not very strict about norms, the ordinance lays down stricter norms and penalties which will ensure more transparency.“

Higher and Technical Education Minister Vinod Tawde had earlier said once passed the ordinance would help decide an appropriate fee structure for professional courses, thereby curbing and preventing profiteering by colleges.

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ORDINANCE

Fee and admission regulatory panels to get former High Court judge as chairperson Stricter norms in ordinance to curb `profiteering' by private institutes Unaided minority institutes to have 51% of seats for students from minority they represent Fee Regulatory Authority to have flying squads for surprise visits to unaided private institutes to verify infrastructure facilities.


Source | Mumbai Mirror | 11 June 2015

No comments:

Post a Comment