Should it be legal to resell e-books, software, and other digital goods?
Should it be legal to resell e-books,
software, and other digital goods?
With e-book reselling heading to the EU Court of Justice,
we examine the complexities of the law.
One of the most interesting questions in the
world of modern entertainment may soon be pondered at Europe's top court: can
people resell the e-books that they buy?
This question is vital in the digital era,
and relevant not just to the world of book publishing, but also the realms of
music, film, and games. You're able to resell the CDs and DVDs that you buy, so
why can't you do the same with downloaded copies of albums and movies?
The case involves a Dutch second-hand e-book
platform called Tom Kabinet, which took a previous ruling by the European Court
of Justice, involving second-hand software, as the go-ahead for its own
business model. Since 2014, Tom Kabinet has been at war with the Dutch
Publishers Association (NUV), which sees it as a threat to the entire book
industry.
The next step in this long-running saga is
the decision of the Dutch supreme court in The Hague, which is currently
scheduled for June 1, its original due date of April having been postponed at
the last minute. Many expect the Dutch court to refer the case to the European
Court of Justice (ECJ), to clear the question up on a pan-EU basis.
How do you ensure the e-books aren't pirated?
Here's the story so far. In 2014, the
publishers tried to get Tom Kabinet shut down, but the Amsterdam district court
refused to grant them a cease-and-desist order. In an early-2015 preliminary
ruling, the Amsterdam court of appeal backed this earlier ruling, but said Tom
Kabinet had to ensure that its platform wasn't being used to sell pirated
e-books.
The company cleared its virtual bookshelves
and started over with a new twist on its model, requiring sellers to provide
the original download links and prove they had legally bought their e-books.
The platform only deals in open formats, as the digital rights management used
by the likes Kindle and iBooks make resale impossible.
Tom Kabinet also tried to get into the
business of reselling new e-books, only to find the three big Dutch publishers
were blocking the country's central book distributor from supplying it—which
prompted a swift complaint to the Dutch competition authority.
While it waits for that investigation to go
somewhere (the regulator won't comment), Tom Kabinet has since become a sort of
book club. To use it, you offer up the download link for your purchased EPUB
e-book and, in return, you get credits. Buying a book from the collection costs
€2 plus a certain number of credits (depending on how new the book is) and,
once you're finished with the book, you can return it to the pot in exchange
for credits—as much as 80 percent of what you paid, if you resell it within
four weeks.
But the main question still remains
unresolved: is it legal for consumers to resell e-books at all? German courts
have suggested the practice should be
stopped, while Dutch courts think it's kosher. But as they're
dealing with the same EU law, they can't both be right.
To find out why this is such a confusing
issue, we have to go back to the 2012 ECJ judgement that birthed Tom Kabinet in
the first place—the Oracle v UsedSoft ruling.
Like most
digital law, it all started with Oracle
UsedSoft,
a German company that sells second-hand software, was buying and reselling
Oracle software licenses from Oracle's customers, either whole or in part—these
were group licenses for 25 users, so customers were sometimes left with
"spare" seats they didn't need. The German firm was then reselling
these licenses to its customers, who could use them to download Oracle's
products.
Oracle pointed out that its license terms
said use of the programs was non-transferable. It sued UsedSoft and won twice
in Germany, before the reseller appealed to the ECJ.
The crux of the ECJ's ruling was this:
once the copyright holder of the software (Oracle in this case) has sold the
product, it doesn't get to stop the buyer from selling it on as she wishes. Its
rights as the seller are "exhausted" in that first sale. In Europe,
this is known as the "principle of exhaustion"; in the US, it's
called the "first-sale doctrine."
That decision became a landmark interpretation
of the EU's 2009 Software Directive.
The directive clearly said the principle of exhaustion applied to a purchased
copy of software. However, before the ECJ's ruling, there was some debate over
whether this applied to "intangible" downloaded software as well as
more traditionally packaged products.
As is the norm these days, Oracle claimed it
sold not the software but the license to use it. The court was unimpressed by
this argument, noting that there is no point downloading something if you can’t
use it, and calling the software-license bundle "an indivisible
whole." It said the principle of exhaustion was not limited to copies of
software sold on physical media, and vindicated UsedSoft's business model—up to
a point.
Most importantly, the court said the Oracle
customers selling to UsedSoft could only do so if they made their own copies
unusable. This meant people couldn't sell off unused slots in their Oracle
bundle and keep using the ones they needed.
Oracle claimed it might be impossible to know
whether the reseller had rendered the original copy unusable. True, said the
ECJ, but the same applies to software sold on physical media such as DVDs—that's
what protective measures such as product keys are for.
In short, if you've legally bought genuine
software, or the license to use that software forever, you get to sell it on no
matter what format you bought it in, and no matter what the licensing terms
say. That's the EU-wide legal precedent.
No comments:
Post a Comment