Data Fabrication? CSIR scientist dismissed for fabricating data
Committees that probed the matter reportedly found ‘hard evidence’ of the fraud by Mr. Cameotra
Swaranjit Singh Cameotra, a senior scientist
at the Chandigarh-based Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), a CSIR lab,
was removed from service early this month for fabricating data in three papers
published in 2013 (April 17, October 1 and October 8) in a scientific journal PLOS
ONE. All the three papers were retracted by the journal in July 2014.
Data fabrication was found in four more
papers where he was the senior author. This is the first time in recent years
that the CSIR has taken the extreme step of terminating the service of a senior
scientist for scientific misconduct.
In a retraction note published in July 2014,
the journal said: “The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) has
carried out an investigation about several publications by this group [led by
Dr. Cameotra] to evaluate concerns raised about the authenticity of the data.
The investigation committee… concluded that there are no data available
underlying this study and thus the published results are fabricated. As a
result, [CSIR] has requested the retraction of the publication.”
Dr. Cameotra was senior scientist at the
Environmental Biotechnology and Microbial Biochemistry Laboratory at IMTECH.
“It is not easy to issue a removal order of a
government employee. There was a thorough enquiry by 2-3 committees and they
found hard evidence… every committee gave a clear-cut decision,” said R.K.
Sinha, who holds additional charge as Director of IMTECH.
Appeal
to CSIR
According to Prof. Sinha, Dr. Cameotra has
submitted an appeal to the Director-General of CSIR to reconsider the decision.
He will still be eligible to apply for any other government job.
Speaking to The Hindu, Dr. Cameotra
said tersely: “I have no comments.”
According to sources close to the
investigation, he had admitted that there was no data to substantiate the
claims made in the papers. Though he did not fabricate the data himself, as a
senior scientist and senior author of the papers, he failed to check if the
data were correct, a highly reliable source told The Hindu. The level of
complicity and scientific misconduct had become clear even at an early stage of
the investigation.
“In this case, the system was not found
wanting,” said Prof. Sinha, referring to other cases where Indian scientists
had got away with plagiarism, and data falsification and fabrication.
Data fabrication came to light when Georgia Tech,
U.S. (where Fazlurrahman Khan, the first author of the papers who worked as a post-doctoral
fellow) found “similarity and overlapping of data presented in the papers and
the work Dr. Khan had done while in the U.S.”
A committee formed by the IMTECH to
investigate the matter found that Dr. Khan was responsible for fabricating the
data. Dr. Khan has since resigned from IMTECH.
Source | The Hindu | 25 July 2016
Regards
Pralhad
Jadhav
Senior
Manager @ Library
Khaitan
& Co
Note | If anybody use these post for forwarding in any social media coverage
or covering in the Newsletter please give due credit to those who are taking
efforts for the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment