HRD against merger of councils with ICSSR
According to sources, the ministry believes that the mandate of the ICHR, ICPR and ICSSR is different and their merger might dilute the specific purpose for which each of the autonomous organisations was originally established.
The ministry is also opposed to the NITI Aayog’s alternative suggestion
to merge the ICHR and ICPR with Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) on the same
ground.
The HRD Ministry is opposed to the idea of
merging its councils of historical and philosophical research with the Indian
Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), as suggested by a review undertaken
by the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) and the NITI Aayog.
Not convinced about the dividends such an
exercise would yield, the Prakash Javadekar-led ministry, at a meeting held
recently, decided to communicate its reservations on the proposal to the PMO
and NITI Aayog.
According to sources, the ministry believes
that the mandate of the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR), Indian
Council of Philosophical Research (ICPR) and ICSSR is different and their
merger might dilute the specific purpose for which each of the autonomous
organisations was originally established.
The ministry is also opposed to the NITI
Aayog’s alternative suggestion to merge the ICHR and ICPR with Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) on the same ground.
The ICHR was set up in 1972 with the
objective of promoting and coordinating research in history and also “to give a
national direction to an objective and scientific writing of history and to
have rational presentation and interpretation of history”.
In 1977, the Union government decided to set
up an exclusive body on the discipline of philosophy, on the lines of the ICHR.
The ICPR was thus established with the aim of preserving “India’s profound,
long and living philosophical tradition”. Over the years, the three councils —
ICSSR, ICPR and ICHR — have served as a battleground for left- and right-wing
ideologies.
Asked about the NITI Aayog’s suggestion,
former ICHR chairman Y S Rao, who retired last month, said, “I came to know of
this proposal only through media reports. I have no information about the
details of the scheme. So I have no comments.”
As first reported by The Indian Express on
June 14, the merger of the ICHR and ICPR with the ICSSR was suggested as part
of the review of the 114 autonomous bodies under seven ministries or
departments, undertaken by the NITI Aayog and PMO.
Out of 114, 42 — almost one-third — were
listed for “reduction”, by either winding them up entirely, merging them with
other entities, reorganising them under a common umbrella, or corporatising
them.
For instance, the review recommended that the
Central Institute of Classical Tamil (CICT) be merged with the Central
Institute of Indian Languages in Mysuru. This has snowballed into a controversy
in Tamil Nadu, with the recommendation seen as the Centre’s attempt to assert
its supremacy on Tamil identity. The state Assembly has taken up the matter and
the Opposition has demanded a resolution against any attempt at merger.
The HRD Ministry will also be apprising the
NITI Aayog of the sensitivities involved in merging or winding up autonomous
bodies established to promote languages.
Source | Indian Express | 17 July 2017
Regards
Pralhad
Jadhav
Senior Manager @
Knowledge Repository
Khaitan
& Co
Upcoming Lecture | ACTREC - BOSLA Annual lecture series (125th birth anniversary of father of library
science, Padmashree Dr. S. R. Ranganathan) on Saturday, 12th August 2017 at Advanced Centre for Treatment,
Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai. (Theme | 'MakerSpace')
No comments:
Post a Comment