According to current UGC regulations, a PhD student is required to publish at least one paper in a peer-reviewed journal before thesis submission
If the recommendations of a four-member committee headed
by Prof. P. Balaram are accepted by the University Grants Commission (UGC), it
will no longer be mandatory for every PhD student in India to publish a paper
in a peer-reviewed journal before he/she is awarded the degree. The committee -
consisting of two people from the humanities field and two from the sciences -
was constituted by the UGC last year.
According to current UGC regulations, a PhD student is
required to publish at least one paper in a peer-reviewed journal before thesis
submission.
"The committee has recommended that the mandatory
requirement of a paper publication in a peer-reviewed journal is not required
for awarding the degree," says Prof. Balaram. "The idea is that
individual institutions should have and implement internal standards and should
be responsible for the quality of thesis produced."
Prof. Balaram adds: "We can’t have the UGC
regulation-imposed quality. Quality of doctoral work has to be improved by
supervisors, examiners and institutions. If they are not bothered then how can
any regulation improve quality? Can a circular from Delhi applicable to all
institutions improve the quality of work?"
He is of the view that supervisors and institutions have outsourced the
responsibility to journals to maintain and improve the quality of doctoral
work. "Academic standard has to be maintained by academics. Right now, the
problem in India is that many institutions have abdicated the responsibility
for PhD quality by outsourcing it to journals," he notes.
"We can’t make bad institutions good by imposing
mandatory requirements or regulations. Students would always find a way to
break the regulation," Prof. Balaram says. That precisely is what happened
in India after the UGC made paper publication prior to thesis submission
mandatory. The number of predatory journals published in India and the number
of papers published in such journal by researchers and students based in India
grew exponentially since 2011. The UGC regulation was announced in June 2009
and notified in the gazette in July 2009.
Alternative solution
Prof. K. VijayRaghavan, Principal Scientific Adviser to
the Government of India offers an alternative solution to UGC’s mandatory
publication rule in a peer-reviewed journal.
"Should a PhD degree in today’s world need prior
publication in the old-school format? The answer is no. Scientific publishing
has been undergoing a revolution the past few years, So it is timely to think
of how work leading to a PhD degree should be communicated," Prof.
VijayRaghavan says in an email to The Hindu.
"One way ahead will be to have the thesis chapters
submitted to arXiv or bioarXiv [preprint servers for physics and biology
respectively] or some such. Move on. [This will] provide valuable learning on
writing up one’s work well. The publications can come in due course, or
not," Prof. VijayRaghavan says. "Postdoc, faculty, funding programmes
should use preprints for evaluation and not value them any less than
publications."
Prof. VijayRaghavan is convinced that doing away with the
current regulation and offering this alternative will have several advantages.
Engineering, the ecological sciences, the humanities each have their own
timelines. But the natural sciences and the life sciences in particular are not
on the fast-track. It also takes a longer time for a student to get a paper
published natural sciences and life sciences.
Encouraging PhD students to submit their articles to
preprint servers will have the valuable effect on getting the training
component done with speedily and move on to the next step. "[At the
post-doctoral level] too, this route of using the preprint server as the first
step should be adopted," he says.
"This approach has the value that you evaluate the
work and not where it is published. It does eventually get peer-reviewed and
published, but that process has no impact on your PhD, or postdoc," Prof.
VijayRaghavan emphasises.
"The measurement of scientific success and its intertwining
with the scientific publishing industry has changed the evaluation in science
and scientific publishing," Prof. VijayRaghavan says. "The large
volume of publications and our self-imposed metrics of success has conflated
quantisation with measuring quality, and precision with accuracy. How much and
where you have published is what is looked at. This must change, bottom-up and
top-down."
He does believe that there can be no escape to some of
the so-called purely objective metric independent of the people evaluating,
such as ‘impact-factor’. "There will be a broth in the evaluation bowl:
Preprints, publications, databases, etc. It’s tough but fair and just. Not just
but unfair as now," he concludes.
Source | https://www.thehindu.com/
Regards
Mr.
Pralhad Jadhav
Research Scholar (IGNOU)
Senior Manager @ Knowledge
Repository
Khaitan & Co
Mobile @ 9665911593
No comments:
Post a Comment